Antidiarrhoeal Activity of Bark Extracts of Caesalpinia
sappan. Linn.
Rasheed Ahmed, KL Senthilkumar*
and M Rajkumar
Department of
Pharmacognosy,
ABSTRACT
The antidiarrhoeal activity and gastrointestinal
motility reducing activity of alcoholic and aqueous extracts of bark of Caesalpinia sappan,linn. were evaluated
at two dose levels. Both the extracts showed significant antidiarrhoeal
activity and reduced the mean weight of faeces and reduced the gastrointestinal
motility significantly.
INTRODUCTION
Caesalpinia sappan, Linn. (Fabaceae) locally known as sappan-wood found almost
throughout
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Plant Material
The bark of Caesalpinia
sappan, Linn. were collected in the month of August 2008 from the
Preparation of Extracts
Preparation of the different extracts of Caesalpinia
sappan, linn. powdered bark is done successively in a continuous soxhlet
extractor with the following solvents. Hexane, Chloroform, Ethyl acetate,
Alcohol and distilled Water. The yield of alcoholic and aqueous extracts was
found to be 26.89% and 17.58% w/w respectively. Both the extracts revealed the
presence of alkaloids and tannins. The extracts were stored in desiccators and
used for further experiments.
Animals Used
Swiss Albino mice for antidiarrhoeal activity and
Wister rats of female sex weighing 140-180gms were used for acute toxicity.
Animals were maintained under standard laboratory conditions. Study protocol
was approved from the Institutional Animals Ethics Committee (IAEC).
ANTIDIARRHOEAL ACTIVITY
Castor oil Induced Diarrhoea
In the present study animals were divided into six
groups of six mice in each group. The animals were divided into control,
positive control and test groups containing six mice in each group. Control
group received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water) at a dose of 10 ml/kg body weight
orally. The positive control group received loperamide at the dose of 3 mg/kg
orally, and test groups received the Alcoholic extract and aqueous extract at
the doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg body weight orally. Each animal was placed in an
individual cage, the floor of which was lined with blotting paper. The
floor lining was changed every hour.
|
Treatment |
Dose
(mg/kg) |
Total
number of faeces in 4 hrs |
Total
number of weight faeces in 4 hrs |
%Inhibition |
|
Control |
- |
13.67±0.99 |
8.67±0.49 |
- |
|
Loperamide |
3 |
3.17±0.48* |
1.83±0.31* |
78.89 |
|
Alcohol
Extract |
200 |
9.66±0.51* |
5.67±0.67 |
34.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
4.25±0.34* |
2.83±0.60* |
67.35 |
|
|
Aqueous
Extract |
200 |
11.5±0.56 |
7±0.58 |
19.26 |
|
400 |
7.83±0.60* |
4.5±0.43* |
48.09 |
TABLE NO. 1: Effect of bark extracts on
castor oil-induced diarrhoea in mice
Results are mean±S.E.M. n=6. *
Significantly different from the control at P<0.001
TABLE NO. 2: Effect of bark extract on the
intestinal transit of charcoal meal in mice
|
Treatment |
Dose
(mg/kg) |
%
Movement of charcoal meal |
%
Inhibition |
|
Control |
- |
65.5±2.28 |
- |
|
Atropine
sulphate |
0.1 |
27.17±2.10* |
58.51 |
|
Alcohol
Extract |
200 |
49.67±1.45* |
24.16 |
|
400 |
28.5±3.06* |
56.44 |
|
|
Aqueous
Extract |
200 |
56.83±2.06 |
13.23 |
|
400 |
42.5±1.82* |
35.11 |
Results are mean±S.E.M. n=6. *
Significantly different from the control at P<0.001
Diarrhoea was
induced by oral administration of 0.5 ml castor oil to each mouse, 30 min after
the above treatments. During an observation period of 4 hours, the total number
of faecal output and the number of diarrhoeic faeces excreted by the animals
were recorded.3-5
Gastrointestinal Motility Test:
For gastrointestinal motility test, animals
were divided into six groups of six mice in each group. The animals were
divided into control and test groups containing six mice in each group. Control
group received vehicle (1% Tween 80 in water) at a dose of 10 ml/kg body weight
orally. Positive control group received atropine sulphate at the dose of 0.1
mg/kg intraperitoneally, and test groups received the alcohol extract and
aqueous extract at the doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg body weight orally
respectively. After 30 min, mice of each group were fed with 1ml of charcoal
meal (3% suspension of deactivated charcoal in 0.5% aqueous methyl cellulose).
After 30 min of the administration of charcoal meal, the animals of each group
were sacrificed and the length of the intestine (pyloric sphincter to caecum)
as well as the distance travelled by charcoal as a fraction of that length was
measured. The charcoal movement in the intestine was expressed as a percentage.6-8
Statistical Analysis:
The results are expressed as mean ± SEM of
six independent experiments. Statistical significance between group was
evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test. A
P < 0.001 value was considered as statistically significant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
In the castor oil-induced diarrhoeal
experiment in mice, the alcoholic and aqueous extracts at the doses of 200 and
400 mg/kg, reduced the total number of faeces as well as the total weight of
diarrhoeic faeces in a dose dependent manner (Table no.1). These results were
shown to be statistically significant. In the gastrointestinal motility test,
the both extract, at the doses of 200 and 400 mg/kg, retarded the intestinal
transit of charcoal meal in mice when compared to the control (Table
no.2). Several mechanisms have been previously proposed to induce the
diarrhoeal effect of castor oil. These include inhibition of intestinal Na+,K+-ATPase
activity to reduce normal fluid absorption, activation of adenylate cyclase or
mucosal cAMP mediated active secretion stimulation of prostaglandin
formation, platelet activating factor and most recently nitric oxide has been
claimed to contribute to the diarrhoeal effect of castor oil. Despite the fact
that these numerous mechanisms have been proposed, it has not been possible to
define castor oil’s correct mechanism of action. However, it is well documented
that castor oil produces diarrhoea due to its most active component recinoleic
acid by a hypersecretory response. Since the alcoholic and aqueous extract at
dose 400 mg successfully inhibited the castor oil-induced diarrhoea, the
extract might have exerted its antidiarrhoeal action by antisecretory mechanism.
This was also evident from the reduction of total number of wet faeces in the
test groups in the experiment.
The extract may have increased the
absorption of water and electrolyte from the gastrointestinal tract, since it
delayed the gastrointestinal transit in mice as compared to the control. The
delay in the gastrointestinal transit prompted by the extracts might have
contributed, at least to some extent, to their antidiarrhoeal activity by
allowing a greater time for absorption. The alcoholic extract showed more
significant activity as compared to aqueous extract.
REFERENCE:
1.
Burkill
HM. 1994. Useful plants of West Tropical Africa. Vol. 2.Families E-I.
2.
Article
taken from www.botany.hawaii.edu
3.
Nwafor,
P.A., Jacks, T.W., Ekanem, A.U., Ching, F.P., 2005. Antiulcerogenic and
antidiarrhoeal potentials of Pausinystalia macroceras stem-bark in rats. Nigerian
Journal of Natural Product and Medicine 9, 66–70.
4.
Shoba,
F.G., Thomas, M., 2001. Study of antidiarrhoeal activity of four medicinal
plants in castor oil induced diarrhoea. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 76,
73–76.
5.
Abdullahi,
A.L., Agho, M.O., Amos, S., Gamaniel, K.S., Wambebe, C., 2001. Antidiarrhoeal
activity of the aqueous extract of Terminalia avicennoides roots.
Phytotherapy Research 15 (5), 431–434.
6.
Uddin,
S.J., Shilpi, J.A., Alam, S.M.S., Alamgir, M., Rahman, M.T., Sarker, S.D.,
2005. Antidiarrhoeal activity of the methanol extract of the barks of Xylocarpus
moluccensis in castor oil and magnesium sulphate-induced diarrhoea models
in mice. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 101, 139– 43.
7.
Awouters,
F., Niemegeers, C.J.S., Lenaerts, F.M., Janssen, P.A.J., 1978. Delay of
castor oil diarrhoea in rats: a new way to evaluate inhibitors of prostaglandin
biosynthesis. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 30, 41–45.
8.
Rao,
V.S.N.,
Received on 10.04.2009
Accepted on 04.06.2009
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research J. Pharmacology and
Pharmacodynamics 1(3) Nov - Dec. 2009; 1(3): 128-129